Democrats Want To STRIP Biden Of Sole Nuclear Launch Authority, He Is NOT Competent

source

▼▼ Show Description ▼▼


Ads




You might be interested in

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
30 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Raymond Hugo Snyman
Raymond Hugo Snyman
6 months ago

Wait, didn't they try and do this with Trump as well? You guys should be careful…

Steve E
Steve E
6 months ago

They made their bed so let them lie in it! Weird democrats had no problem with other democrats having that power before!

Rxxman
Rxxman
6 months ago

No problem. Just have President Trump support having other people have the Nuclear football and the dumbocrats we be against it.

Mk V2
Mk V2
6 months ago

gotta say, Tim and Beard Guy (not ian, other guy) are on the right track here. the point of a president is to be the person who can act quickly. if Biden isn’t able to hold the nuclear codes, he isn’t able to be the president. PERIOD.

JKDRAGONJK
JKDRAGONJK
6 months ago

I mean the russians have a system like that. If their nuclear command is ever taken out and comms to the nukes are cut off, then the nukes automatically launch

P D
P D
6 months ago

The authority is given due to the fact there is no time for a committee to decide to launch. If the US is attacked the President must immediately launch a retaliatory strike, in the old days before Russia made those hypersonic missiles it took 1/2 hr from an ICBM to go from Russia to the US, much faster now. If there is a delay in launch, most of the silos would be taken out before they can launch….some nation may decide, they can strike hard and fast enough, betting they can take America out of the fight before they could hit back.

Cannot remove the MAD deterrent

ULTRASMURF
ULTRASMURF
6 months ago

To china's, Russia's, Iran's, and North Korea's delight

Rocky Branch Firearm Farms Rooster
Rocky Branch Firearm Farms Rooster
6 months ago

When it’s decentralized then you are releasing accountability from any one person to a group that will never accept any responsibility for destroying the world

Rocky Branch Firearm Farms Rooster
Rocky Branch Firearm Farms Rooster
6 months ago

Sorry. We need the football to stay within the hands of the pres and no one else

arphaksad01
arphaksad01
6 months ago

Military would not launch if Joe told them in first strike scenario. America is finished thanks to insane Democrats

Babu
Babu
6 months ago

It wasn't Biden's idea to bomb Syria, it with the generals' who probably have ties to the military industrial complex industries and would profit from more war activity. They urged him to give the okay on false information yet again that the one group that they bombed had launched the missile strike when it was actually another smaller group with no base in Syria. The last thing you want is the war hungry generals to get the nuclear codes.

I think Biden has enough sense to not just throw around nukes recklessly. He made a better state of the union speech than Trump ever did, and he has gotten to work right away on getting legislative orders signed. He got the stimulus package rolling right away. He might be almost senile, but he isn't an immature narcissist to the extent Trump was. I think it is best just to leave the threat in the hands of one man surrounded by his cabinet of advisors than to just hand it off to an arguing panel of egomaniacs.

Trevor Gardner
Trevor Gardner
6 months ago

Here's why you DON'T want joint responsibility for launching nukes…

Say you need to launch the nukes because of an inbound attack and you have about 30 minutes or less before you won't be able to do anything. With joint control there must be some communication between the various controllers. That communication takes time. It's also extremely vulnerable. All the Russians would need to do then is wait until one or more of the controllers is out of reach or incapacitated. Then the ability to launch may be temporarily gone for long enough to get off a first strike. Or they could actively hinder that communication with jamming or hacking. Even the presumption of an inability to launch or launch quickly could change Russia's calculus on whether or not to launch a first strike. So even just talking about doing this is potentially world-ending.

Robin Banks
Robin Banks
6 months ago

I'd prefer it if BLM didn't get access to the launch codes, but imagine how funny it would be if stupid idpol bullshit caused the apocalypse.

Patrick Winters
Patrick Winters
6 months ago

Pelosi wants the power so she can nuke us Trump supporters

scandalasdog
scandalasdog
6 months ago

You "agree" to putting the USA in that position ?? ,Tim thinks Trump should just "Shut Up" ??. Tim doesn't like Trumps tweets like the moronic middle class nitwits, yet drinks the "coolaid" like it really is Champaign ? WTF ? . Unless you take that ability away from other nations, its mindless to put yourself in that totally vulnerable position. Moronic Dems cant see a single step ahead of their OWN policies. Tim, along with his "ilk", think Trump should know his place and shut up ? How egotistical even aspiring "Journalists" truly are.

Clinton Scott
Clinton Scott
6 months ago

I hate to bring this up. But, what country in their right mind would make a peace deal with another country that will recognize the sovereignty 9f their country and start removing their invasion forces then a few months later start ramping up troop movements back into the same country as well as bombing them again without a declaration of war?

Mike the Skeptical One
Mike the Skeptical One
6 months ago

No, no, and no … the job of Commander in Chief is to say "Yes" or "No" to the keg 'o whupass being opened.

If he is not competent to make this decision, then he is not competent to do the job. Period, dot, end of discussion. If, all aspects of divinity forfend, launching nuclear weapons is the BEST available option, the decision whether or not to do so canNOT be trusted to a committee. And the argument that when the system was set up the possible repercussions didn't include Armageddon, so we have to change it, is BULLSHEITE. It's MORE critical, not LESS, given the inherent danger of modern warmaking potential … if anything does happen, it will happen very, VERY quickly, and anything that slows the decision-making tree will exponentially increase the danger.

2BitUser
2BitUser
6 months ago

Should be like a self destruct in star trek the voyage home required 3 command officers to enter their codes. Tng at least required 2 both Picard and Riker.

Anony grazer
Anony grazer
6 months ago

So Pelosi asks Pentagon take PRESIDENT Trump's nuclear capability away – Pentagon explains that would be a coup…yet for Biden's inauguration, she asked Pentagon for machine guns w/LIVE ammo & Pentagon had to explain they aren't allowed against AMERICAN CITIZENS. How is a sitting US senator has to have BASIC RIGHTS and PROTECTIONS…EXPLAINED to her? How is the Left is ok w/it all as long as it's not against THEM? And at what point down the road…does it end up used against them too? ONly fools DON'T ask those questions.

John Trustworthy
John Trustworthy
6 months ago

So it turns out Trump did become the last american president.

John Trustworthy
John Trustworthy
6 months ago

The best proposal was to have the launch keys implanted in a capsule behind the heart of a person, so that the only way a launch can occur is by having the president personally kill a person.

mythmurzin
mythmurzin
6 months ago

someone needs to let tim know that congress neutered the president. the president cannot enact martial law without an act of congress anymore. one of things they did and included in that emergency bill i forget which one, but it changed the insurrection act to also require an act of congress. the only emergency power left for the president is to wage war for up to 30 days, and declare a state of emergency and those powers are limited in what he can do. especially "under arms"

GoolagIsTheNewGulag
GoolagIsTheNewGulag
6 months ago

They should. I don't trust Biden to be able to use that authority responsibly.

JOHN PLABST
JOHN PLABST
6 months ago

If he can't do the job, he shouldn't have the job. It's about power hungry control freaks stroking their egos. Nukes by committee. That will work out well.

2014 2ss
2014 2ss
6 months ago

How much would the lunch codes be worth?

King Fog
King Fog
6 months ago

I said it joes a proxy Kamala is president

Condor1994
Condor1994
6 months ago

The onlyn reason to do this is if you plan to use them

T Freezy
T Freezy
6 months ago

He's in because they cheated not because they hate Trump. Wtf is wrong with yall?

Rohnek Kdosi
Rohnek Kdosi
6 months ago

Argument (A): Maybe several people should have to all agree to launch
Counter Argument (CA): If the US becomes a target of a nuclear strike, the response has to be quick
A: What about automated response?
CA: Oh, boy, let me tell you about the one time a tape entered into a computer caused a false alert that nearly led to the launch. The reason it didn't was that people realized something was wrong with the detection system

Dave B
Dave B
6 months ago

I wouldn't let Biden have sole authority of the TV remote.

Oh hi there 👋
It’s nice to meet you.

Sign up to for the latest content in your inbox, every week!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.